|
Welcomed competition
Booming mobile business seen expanding
written by Patrícia Margit and Barbara Vásárhelyi
Hungary’s new telecommunications act, which is currently being
debated in Parliament, is expected to further boost competition
in the mobile phone market. With three competing mobile phone operators
and over 7 million active mobile users, the Hungarian market is
probably the toughest in the entire region.
The second year of liberalized telecommunications in Hungary was
marked by a decline in the number of fixed-line subscribers, but
a persistently growing mobile market. In the first quarter of 2003,
the number of mobile subscriptions – including active SIM cards
and analogue subscription – rose to over 7 million for the first
time, says a telecommunication market quarterly report compiled
by the National Communications Authority (HIF). A comparison of
2003’s summer figures with those from the summer of 2002, shows
an increase in mobile phone subscriptions of 22%. The numbers illustrate
a major trend in the telecommunications sector – in a country of
only 10 million inhabitants.
Westel leads the sector with a 47.5% market share, while Pannon
GSM ranks second at 36.94%, followed by Vodafone, the smallest
player, but one that is quickly growing with a 15.56% share of
the market, according to HIF.
Vodafone kicks off competition
While prices increasingly level off, competition speeds up and
mobile companies react faster to each other’s steps. Several
years ago it took mobile operators almost half a year to counter
each other’s marketing actions, but today it is a matter of days.
This type of competition was started by Vodafone, Hungary’s third
mobile phone provider, which entered the market in 1999. Initially
Vodafone’s prices were some 15-20% lower than anything offered
on the market, but in the time since Westel and Pannon have lowered
their prices as well. Since March this year, Westel has introduced
three new post-paid and Domino packages that offer competitive
and unified tariffs on calls made to fixed-line or other mobile
networks. Westel’s cheapest offer for subscribers is its ‘Társalgó
M’ package, under which users can call within the network for HUF
36.75 per minute in peak hours. Under Pannon’s ‘Horizont’ package,
subscribers can choose between three different categories (Bónusz,
Plusz, Extra) that offer economical prices for calls made at different
times of the day. In the meantime, Vodafone has come forward with
its Rock 'n' Roll Csúcs Plusz subscription package, which offers
a tariff of HUF 6 per minute for the first 10 minutes of a call
made to any network.
Competition is also fierce among mobile operators for pre-paid
card users. Although companies believe they will win customers
by advertising the lowest prices, many pre-paid packages hide additional
charges for calls made after prime time hours. Even after Hungary’s
new telecom law takes effect, price competition will continue since
there are still significant reserves in pre-paid card rates, analysts
say. “I don’t see any reason why competition should slow down any
time soon,“ Pannon GSM’s CEO Klaus Rasmussen told Business Hungary.
Although mobile operators are extremely careful about detailing
their strategies, experts are convinced telephone equipment prices,
along with regular subscribers, will remain the main campaign elements
in the future. One aspect of the new telecom law states that from
May 1, 2004, customers may keep their mobile numbers even if they
switch providers. Analysts believe this will greatly rearrange
the market, as pre-paid phone customers will probably have to say
goodbye to cheap mobile handsets, as it would not be in any company’s
interest to give expensive, modern phones cheaply to customers
who could change providers at any moment.
Meanwhile, the value of regular subscribers is expected to grow
and those customers who sign a long-term contract will be the most
important. Pannon GSM, for instance, is not focusing on the SIM
card market, but rather on the post-paid customer segment, Rasmussen
said. The current price competition, mostly focused on pre-paid
card users, is seen spreading to subscribers who would be able
to make cheaper calls as well. Vodafone’s Telecom Policy Director
Pál Marchart says: “I expect up-to-date, user-friendly regulations
from the new law. I hope that the new law will stimulate market
competition even in those markets that show monopolistic signs
today.” Following an Oct. 14 discussion on the new telecom law
in Parliament, some government leaders were less than optimistic
– especially members of the opposition. Fidesz MP Antal Rogán stated
in Parliament that he did not think the law would reduce prices.
MSZP Representative Gyula Molnár argued that the new law was essential
because the previous one does not fulfill its function of creating
real market competition.
Real market competition?
Analysts believe that prices would radically drop if real market
competition existed in the market. This question was first raised
by Hungary’s Competition Authority (GVH). The office made headlines
recently with its inquiry into the telecommunications services
sector, which resulted in imposed fines for Westel and Pannon.
Tünde Váczi, director of GVH’s info-communications office, said
the sector inquiry enabled GVH to achieve an accurate view of
the mobile phone sector. The office found what they termed as
“several problems” on the mobile market, mainly with the pricing
of calls generated from mobile phones to fixed-line networks.
GVH accused mobile operators of having restrictive practices
in place to boost mobile use in Hungary. While the inquiry started
out by alleging a mobile phone cartel, in the end it accused
mobile service providers of little and could not prove such actions
were a coordinated effort on the part of mobile operators. GVH
could not even prove that call fees to other networks were too
high, but rather could only state that some contracts among mobile
providers could distort competition. Westel was fined HUF 210
million and Pannon GSM HUF 150 million by GVH. The fine is not
substantial, however, and accounts for a mere fraction of mobile
operators’ turnover. Westel and Pannon said they will appeal
the GVH decision in Hungarian courts. Vodafone did not have to
pay fines either, but company executives said in a statement:
“it is regrettable that the first large case is about the only
market actors of the telecommunications sector where real market
competition takes place.”
Mobile companies did agree, however, that fees for calls to other
mobile service providers will cost less than calling fixed-line
operators.
New players after EU accession?
New operators are expected to enter the Hungarian fixed-line market
following Hungary’s EU accession. With the mobile market, the
situation is markedly different. Given the considerable number
of active mobile phone users in the Hungarian population, a potential
new operator would need a robust financial background, as return
on the investment would be bound to take a good number of years.
“I have never run the math for a fourth operator, however seeing
my own financials, I think it would take a very brave company
and a very brave bank to take on such a project,” said Vodafone
Hungary’s CEO Attila Vitai. The fact that the number of mobile
providers is not bound to increase in the future is one issue
that all three operators seem to agree on. “It would be tough
business for anyone to enter this market. I’m sure that a potential
fourth player will have to possess a lot of patient money,” said
Pannon’s Rasmussen.

|